[gallo]

Quote by: Will_00 It is not at all "mythology." Not even close. It is Truth - despite what you say.

Actually, even Biblical scholars recognize that much of the Bible is mythology, or moral stories meant to teach a lesson. The Jewish people have always known that the stories of Jonah and Job are just stories, not history.

Yet your standard for "truth" is not even remotely close to the absolute Truth or evidence.

I wasn't talking about truth, just what is true. Science doesn't deal with truth.

Nope. That is too bad.

Good answer! Deny making silly assertions with a silly assertion. Of course, what else can you do but make silly assertions when you are asked for evidence?

Why would he "falsify" it? The Truth has already been stated - so your wrong.

So my wrong? What about my wrong? What wrong was that? Moreover, what truth is it that has already been stated?

By the way, that was kind of my point. Why would your little god lie by fabricating the evidence that perfectly imitates what the fossil record would look like if evolution and common descent were true? Why would he place the evidence to lead people astray and then punish them forever if they follow that evidence? To believe that would mean that god is even more petty, cruel, and vindictive than the christians tell us he is. Besides, from a realistic point, why should we invent a magical being for which there is no evidence when naturalistic explanations are quite sufficient to explain nature.

It is not at all fake! Despite your continual use of "truth" and "evidence" I have found no relation to the absolute existance of Belief.

I didn't mention truth. You did. You claimed to know it even though you can't even tell us why or what it is. I did mention evidence since I don't see any reason why I should believe you or anyone else about a book that is quite plainly mythology. There is no such thing as absolute belief.