Quote:
Quote by: Sonart  Hmmmm... thought I had. Let me try again.
By this I figured you were referring to the traditional values of America's Christian majority, which is essentially that what's good for Christians ought to be good enough for everyone else.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but what I think I keep hearing is the incredibly backwards logic that it's the non-Christians who are imposing their will and showing lack of respect by demanding that Christians stop imposing their religion on others and showing disrespect by presuming it shouldn't matter to non-Christians because, as stated above, what's good for Christians ought to be good enough for everyone else.
Pretty much what I just stated above. "If you want us Christians to respect your ways, then you have to respect our right to have our way as the dominant religion." Pretty weird logic, if I understand it correctly. |
Not quite correct :-)
@Sonart
"Respect works in Both ways, and not one way selectively and/or exclusively. Religious and/or Non-Religious approach is Ir-relevant."
This is the sense of my expression.
The example with "walking down the street" is an expansion, directed at psychological and/or social factors, and it is conditioned by the value of coin.
In short : there is a long way ahead for Homo Sapiens, till it reaches the level for fundamental values of Respect. So far, overwhelming portion of Homo Sapiens simulates that process, only.