Quote:
Quote by: grandpa  First of all, that's the kind of crap democrats have been guaranteeing for years, but nearly all of the power is going into elite corporate hands. If you have Hillary, you have corporate capitalism or fascism (or, more accurately, a combination of both).
Let's look at the options the two party's give us regarding healthcare:
1. "Let's give better care to the rich, but let's snip out the
other groups."
2. "Let's force everyone to pay for healthcare."
Neither of these are top notch, as far as I'm concerned.
Grandpa h. |
And so what is your middle-road or alternative health care idea that you would claim is "top notch"?
Do you really think that your faultless plan is possible? What political name would you use for your idea of that top notch program?
The Hillary health plan is not really about trying to establish some sort of poltical idealogy, it is about making sure that people can have health care services that can fit into the family budgets. Name calling in my opinion is just a distraction from forming a government that represents compassion in action. The medical industry should have the ability to offer compassion without going bankrupt, or without making too much profit like vultures feeding off the degeneration of the middle class.
We should not force poor people to remian unhealthy because that is also a form or control over the economy and the people subjected to our current economical status, which status is likewise degenerating. It is important to make the economics relative to health care healthy in order to insure that the population as a whole can be healthy. Sick people are not the best resource for manning our potential work force once we get back on top economically.