Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1  Why, because it would be too disturbing to believe we have no more control than that? |
Im not arguing we have control, but fate does.
We have as little control over that as chance.
Quote:
|
It's impossible that some jerk like Oswald could have shot Kennedy on his own, because the world can't be that unpredictable?
|
That could be, but there is too much evidence that JFK was really done in by his own government, or whatever is pulling the strings of that government, Oswald was a patsy expertly groomed and positioned to take the fall, I suggest you read up on the assassination, and strange circumstances that allowed a marksman to kill JFK so easily.
Its already been established that there is no way LHO could have taken those shots from the position and angle where he was placed, especially so accurately, and with the rifle he had.
Most damning of government involvement also is in the Zapruda tape, you see just before Kennedy's car comes into the killing zone, bodyguards who normally stand on the car in places or at least walk/run along side it to help block a possible shot, are called back to the car behind Kennedy's leaving the President open for a clear shot on him.
This says who ever is co ordinating security obviously knows the President must be in the open so he can be taken out, its just too convenient to be co incidence, that within a minute of security being removed out of the assassins firing line the President is also killed.
You see one agent throw his hands up in bewilderment because he probably doesn't know why he is being pulled away from the presidents car.
YouTube - JFK assassination: Secret Service Standdown Quote:
|
Why is fate a more appropriate historical determinant? What attribute does it have over chance?
|
Destiny.