Depends what you define 'Macho' as I suppose. I thought it was more about being strong and manly then being arrogant.
Quote:
|
Personally if I had my kid with me I'd hand over my wallet. I'm not putting my child in jeaporody for a few hundred at most.
|
Thats a logical descision.
Most men would probably want to fight just to prove their masculinity. Putting their family in danger in the process.
Oops, did I just make a sweeping generalization, that is degrading to a gender? What do you know, it goes both ways.
Quote:
'All men are dangerous, even my husband therefore I must train him not to be dangerous, not to be himself because that terrify's me and makes him uncontrollable.'
But then what happens when the fem nut is walking around at night with her big submissive manboy in tow, an ugly situation happens and suddenly she expects him to suddenly rise up and become the big protecting man again, only problem is he's so emasculated he's too slow to react properly and gets clobbered.
|
Your making uneducated generalizations, with a preschoolers logic.
He carries the baby. Therefore, his to emasculated to fight.
Give me one study that proves a link between dominance, and fighting ability.
Samurai's were the most obedient servants in history - but they are known for their superior fighting ability.