Quote:
Quote by: Ajdub18  Ok, let me try this out here. You are saying that consciousness must exsist in order for space and matter to exsist. It is the link between absolute nothingness and something. I tend to agree with this notion. Why do we all seem to experience the same space and matter once consciousness arrives? Does this back the theory that we are pieces of one consciousness?
So if you wanted to get to and from zero you would use addition and subtraction. To put it really simply...adding consciousness or subtracting it, rather than dividing it.
You lost me on the circular momentum...I understand what it is and how it would be unseen, but missed its relevance. Are you saying that consciousness is circular momentum? |
First. If you draw a circle and start at point A you would then continue the line around until the end merges with pont A. If you followed that same circle then you could not visibally be able to tell at what point in the circle point A is at ( at least if I drew the circle you could not tell where it I started to draw the circle at).
I am not sure if consciousness is a motion or momentum. We cannot put it into a testube and study it. We could perhaps determine if we want to discribe thoughts as being in motion, like a thought-stream.
But let us imagine that consciouness would evolve as a mind when related thoughts reproduced more thoughts, and those thoughts orbited around a center point of relative stillness, thus you would have lots of related thoughts orbiting around in a mind which is expanding form that center point of "nothingness" (a taboo word) which is utter silence. (do not have words to make exact discriptions with as yet).
That grouping of thoughts which would be called the orginal mind would be surrounded by space, with a center point of space out of which the thoughts manifested. If the thoughts became aware, those thoughts by reflecting inwardly could determine a contrast between thinking and that nothingness, and that contrast would provide evidence of self-consciousness, and/or self-exsistance.
That would place consciousness as the that invisible zone between nothingness and thought, as thoughts would be sub-particles that make up the whole fomulation of the conscious mind. Thoughts would become the activity of consciousness within consciousness as a pre-factor for energy where-in thoughts seek to complete a total idea. Which idea would be the idea of exsistance. (hope you do not mind if I sound a bit like some alien with this report).
The factor that thoughts would be circular in their momentum would suggest that the first "design" established is the circle. And lucky for us the symbol for zero - ground zero as it where - is shaped like a circle. The number " 0 " is a circle.
So we can use the symbol of "0" as a name for the god. note that the middle letter in the word god is also a "o". lucky for me and my wanna-be theory.
Now if you draw a flat line it really has no purpose because without an end point it can have no goal. It just goes on and on to nowhere. At least a circular line has a purpose which is to return to the beginning point of it's orgin. Returning home so to speak from a journey.
That would suggest that our human consciousness can have purpose by returning to it's orgins at point A, which in religious terms would be for our consciousness to re-unite with the god-consciousness, the oversoul, the indwelling spirit, or whatever name you wish to use. To complete the journey and give purpose to the meaning of exsistance.
But beyond that the consciousness, of which we are a part of, must return also to that center point of stillness, by looking within, and about finding a point of relative stillness within our self, called "my space". Or in your case. your space. That center point of stillness is called the soul of our consciousness. A space that is also a portal to that source of enlightened thoughts, which ocur out of nothingness. (aka - out of the blue). As so evidenced by this wanna-be theory which came out of the blue. By using our consciousness to create a space of absolute not knowing we create a void that MUST be filled with a knowing. That principle discribes the essence of conscious creation.
This idea however would bring a big boo form both the science and the reilgious communities because of it's alienated departure from their norms of thinking.
This is just part one of the wanna-be theory.