[rez]

Quote by: Ajdub18 How do you explain quantum discoveries, such as electrons existing as wave functions rather than particles, the ability to be in two or more places at the same time, the neccesity of an observer, or any of the major discoveries of science that are unexplainable relative to the world we know and see as reality?

You answer them like you answer any other problem you encounter in your life. The difference is quantum physics is more complicated then figuring out why your computer will not turn on. And even the latter is complicated for some.

As far as evolution goes, does it really make sense the way we have evolved based on past human experiences? Why do we have to build machines to make us fly, why haven't we developed wings? Why did we have to develop cars to make us go faster and clothes to make us warm?

Because there is also a thing called "memetic evolution". Why does a monkey use a stick to hold itself up in the river? Why does a bear find a cave to hibernate. Why don't 21st century humans understand basic Biology?

Could it be that we are evolving to experience some "future" that has already happened.

Could it be you have no clue why you actually think things like that?

This makes just as much sense as picking out reasons we have evolved the way we have from looking at the past.

Problem. No it does not. Considering that all modern medicine and Biology is based off evolution and zero things are based off your crackpot imagination, I would have to think you are really really wrong.

I'm just saying even in science there are many ways of answering questions of reality. So your questions 4 and 5 will continue to lack one definite answer as long as questions of reality exist.

How does having no definite way of answering 4 and 5 put science on the same level as layman imagining different scenario's?