[xyzer]

Parrot... talk about quibbling about the details? Check out this one..National Business Review (NBR) - Business, News, Arts, Media, Share Market & More

You sullied proponents of the the threat of anthropogenic causes of warming are seeing your dogma challenged. The IPCC and others overlooked some simple evidence that the doomsday climate models didn;t have. Actual measurement by the latest(Aqua) satellite showed this! A few snippets from an article you proponets should read and then restructure your thinking?

In December last year, at the UN conference in Bali, I heard Viscount Monckton present a paper prepared by himself, the Australian Dr David Evans and our own Dr Vincent Gray (who were at Bali, too) that showed while the IPCC models predict that greenhouse gases would produce an extensive "hot spot" in the upper troposphere over the tropics, the satellite measurements show no such hotspots have appeared.

If you noticed the press and the scientific community have grown largely silent about this latest revelation? Wonder why? Why didn't the March Meeting in New York produce screaming headlines? Could it be that these alarmist bozos are embarrassed?

Atmospheric scientists generally agree that as carbon dioxide levels increase there is a law of "diminishing returns" - or more properly "diminishing effects" - and that ongoing increases in CO2 concentration do not generate proportional increases in temperature. The common analogy is painting over window glass. The first layers of paint cut out lots of light but subsequent layers have diminishing impact.

Read this article and let us know what you think? Does it answer my repeated question..why if CO2 is so influentual(and increasing) do satellite measurments show it is cooling?

The IPCC models assumed water vapour formed clouds at high altitudes that lead to further warming. The Aqua satellite observations and Spencer's analysis show water vapour actually forms clouds at low altitudes that lead to cooling.