[Hurt]

Quote by: Matt They don't need their 'fair' share, they aren't natural predators. When you say 'control', what do you exactley mean? I agree, introducing natural predators to some extent and limiting hunting to some extent would be a good compromise for both sides, and I would be happy if that happened. Though I doubt most hunters would, though I don't know, I would like to hear their responses. No, it is not 100% proved logic, but it is right alot of the time. Dr. Phil agrees with me lol Yes, it is life threatening for many species of animals, who are on the verge of extinction in North America. Many species in North America have already went extinct. No, their aren't any great famines or diseases in North America, but AIDS is bad in some parts of the USA. Also, in Africa and Asia there are huge diseases and famines, which shows you there are overpopulations there. I don't have a right to stop people from doing it, but I can air my opinion loud and clear.

So the animals that are going extinct aren't allowed to be hunted, that's already been done. What's your point? Where are you going with this?