[Kizzume]

Quote by: Technosoul Here is another experiment utube video - smoking vs science - Google Search Most of you would think smoking is real bad because of the tar stain on the tissue. But notice, if the smoke is inhaled into the lungs you get more brown stain then if you kept the smoke in the mouth. This might be evidence that the lungs were already poluted due to breathing air polution from another source.

Isn't that quite a stretch?

If tar from the cigarette did stick in the lungs how come you get more stain by inhaling?

I don't know, maybe because the more smoke, the more stain, the more stain, the more stain, the more stain.

You should get less from a scientific point of view if the smoke is sticking in the lungs and not being breathed out.

Is this one of those realities when up is down and down is sideways and sideways is a wormhole to a place somewhere in southeast Asia? What kind of science suggests that when there should be more of something, there should actually be less of it? Please post more on the subject of the science of a substance disappearing the more of that substance that gets accumulated. Imagine the kinds of new cleaning technologies that could be made from that kind of concept. Wow :) :rolleyes:

Also (lacking from the experiment) what would happen if you breathed on the tissue and we not smoking?

????

the experiment showed that you can use smoking to get rid of more polution from the lungs then you put into the lungs. Which would suggest that smoking is good. The smoke acturally collects polution already in your lungs so you can exhale it with the smoke.

It still collects and accumulates on the lungs unless it was done on such a seldom basis that it was if the person wasn't even smoking at all, like one cigarette a week, or once a month or something.