Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post - Video: Feds fire on Brown Supporter in New Hampshire

Charlatan · Apr 6, 2008, 09:02 pm

Taxes to be paid to the government were a way to rebuild America at first, but is there still need to rebuild America from that war? At some point the authorities thought of using the taxes to pay off other things, and decided not to stop them. So you had basic services before taxes, and then started paying for them, making for better services? Did the services get better from the time of inset until now? Yes, they got better all over the world, but that is also because of the taxes themsleves. So how did the government provide services before taxes were introduced? Someone had to pay for it. Were they to rely on charity from people? Didn't the government have a way of making money other than off the people? If there were no taxes today, then the government would be poorer, and probably would be unable to provide services at all. So look at the government as a company, a company that taxes you regularly to provide funds for services that all people get to use.

Why not pay taxes? Because they dip into your funds and that means that you will be in more trouble to make ends meet. Taxes are a burden on anybody that pays them, so when you don't pay them you are better off. So by not paying for services you still get them, and most probably use them. Nobody wants to pay taxes, but they need to pay a dividend to the country on whose currency they use, by trading within the borders they agree that they have made all of that money within the country, using dollars or whatever for the oppurtunity to amass a greater deal of that currency. The government owns the gold that enables it to print money, so even that is a service, the provision of the currency to enable people to treade quickly on a reliable platform. So since it is the currecny you use, you should pay for the right to use it, as a means of security, knowing that it will be recognised as good for use.

The rest of this case is that the people didn't pay taxes, people got in the way, the police got armed as usual, they used reliable tactics to get the perps into custody as there was reason to believe that they might be dangerous, so, how did this become a debate?

Apr 6, 2008, 09:02 pm	#45 (permalink) (top)
Charlatan Igneous Magma Location: Cape Town South Africa Posts: 256	Taxes to be paid to the government were a way to rebuild America at first, but is there still need to rebuild America from that war? At some point the authorities thought of using the taxes to pay off other things, and decided not to stop them. So you had basic services before taxes, and then started paying for them, making for better services? Did the services get better from the time of inset until now? Yes, they got better all over the world, but that is also because of the taxes themsleves. So how did the government provide services before taxes were introduced? Someone had to pay for it. Were they to rely on charity from people? Didn't the government have a way of making money other than off the people? If there were no taxes today, then the government would be poorer, and probably would be unable to provide services at all. So look at the government as a company, a company that taxes you regularly to provide funds for services that all people get to use. Why not pay taxes? Because they dip into your funds and that means that you will be in more trouble to make ends meet. Taxes are a burden on anybody that pays them, so when you don't pay them you are better off. So by not paying for services you still get them, and most probably use them. Nobody wants to pay taxes, but they need to pay a dividend to the country on whose currency they use, by trading within the borders they agree that they have made all of that money within the country, using dollars or whatever for the oppurtunity to amass a greater deal of that currency. The government owns the gold that enables it to print money, so even that is a service, the provision of the currency to enable people to treade quickly on a reliable platform. So since it is the currecny you use, you should pay for the right to use it, as a means of security, knowing that it will be recognised as good for use. The rest of this case is that the people didn't pay taxes, people got in the way, the police got armed as usual, they used reliable tactics to get the perps into custody as there was reason to believe that they might be dangerous, so, how did this become a debate? Poison for the system!