Quote:
Quote by: Kizzume  What would be proof for you? What form would the proof have to be in for you to believe it? This seems like trying to prove the existence of God to a die-hard atheist, it's seeming that you're needing proof that is impossible to give. |
That was my point - they make a claim and expect you to believe it based on your faith in the "saints of science".
What I am requesting as proof is to see the footnotes and the methods used that the claim is based on. Just saying "we did a study" is not enough proof. I want to see the actural study as it was outlined, the questons they asked of their study group, what potentals were concidered or not concidered, how they interpreted the stats collected, etc.
If you ask science why they like the theroy of the Big Bang they can show you all the physics and other facts used to reach that claim, if you ask religion the same question about Creationism they cannot produce their facts to support their claim. If epidemiology wants me to accept their claim then show me the "nuts and bolts" upon which that claim is resting.
Why would you have a problem understanding that simple request?
If you believe in UFOs then show me one that I can physically examine.
Don't just make claims.