Quote:
Quote by: gela  These things have been studied. Thats why when you look up lung cancer, it will say there are several causes - but smoking is the main one.
It has all been done before. Your not the first person to come up with these ideas.
It was decided that smoking is the main cause. After investigating all of the causes.
All health proffesionals have agreed that smoking is bad. It is not debated amongst any scientists. It is accepted as fact.
Pot is still debated amongst health proffesionals.
That is the difference. |
The whole purpose of the conspiracy was to create that impression in the public mind.
In the 1970s everyone knew that smog was the main cause, resulting in an advertising blizits to change public opinon, so people would not protest agenst industry ( Oil and fuel companies, Dow chemicals, computer chip companies, auto and military products). It worked, now you and most of the public believe that tobacco is the main cause. Now people protest tobacco. Which is what you to do and why they manipulated public opinion.
This has already been gone over a few times through-out this thread, you do not agree with those facts.
You are helping them create that opinon by repeating the same claim over and over.
All health porffesionals are involved in repeating the claim, they are not involved in any research and will repeat what they are told to repeat. A doctor can bill medicare or an insurance company for spending time to tell you to stop smoking, they are paid to tell you that. (but they will not show you, or provide for you, the notes taken about how the so-called studies were conducted or funded).
Why are you just repeating the claim and not debating the facts I have presented to counter educate you?
If smoking is the main cause why are we still donating money for cancer research?
Why are people who are not exposed to cigarette smoke still dieing from cancer?