Quote:
Where did you come up with the idea that the studies you advocated are done with 90% accuracy? And that all other studies done with real scicnce in the lab and with the so-called science of epidemilogy are wrong, or are not as "obvious" if they did not point the finger at tobacco?
I hear a little bias in your claims.
|
You've misunderstood what Im saying.
I don't mean the accuracy is 90%; I mean that the studies find that 90% of lung cancer patients have smoked.
I think I posted the site with that stat at the beggining of the thread..
Im saying that if 90% of lung cancer patients also had ongoing stress, then it would have been looked into.