Quote:
Quote by: Chaossaber314  Feel free to provide evidence that...
A.) They didn't have a warrant.
B.) The area where this man was walking was a part of his property.
Either will suffice. |
My issue was the camoflaged officers, and their tactics when confronted.
Quote:
Quote by: Chaossaber314 Fact is, if they had a warrant, they are well within their legal ability and authority to surveil the location before executing said warrant. This is even more secured if they have a no-knock warrant. |
Really? Is using militay camoflage, stealth, and weaponry within constitutional bounds?
Quote:
Quote by: Chaossaber314 Well then provide evidence to support your impression.
So you admit to jumping to conclusions. Fair enough. |
I didn't feel that any conclusions were "jumped to", I was merely opining on the footage provided. Jumping to conclusions would imply that there was not a long list of transgressions done in a similar manor by the same entities.
Quote:
Quote by: Chaossaber314 Sorry but unless you can prove they didn't fire less than lethal rounds at the individual your argument doesn't hold any water. You wouldn't give them the benefit of less than lethal that they would probably give you. |
Again, I'm discussion the tactics, and the protocols of the officers visible in the video.
Even if they do have a warrant, I have issues with the way they confronted the person outside the building, the lack of an announcement of who they were, and what their intentions were.
All legitimate things to question after the Waco, and Ruby Ridge incidents.