Quote:
|
Quote by: Milton So you're OK with the Feds trespassing to surveil people?
To clarify my position, I'm not OK with that. Law enforcement is supposed t announce their presence, and their intent. |
Feel free to provide evidence that...
A.) They didn't have a warrant.
B.) The area where this man was walking was a part of his property.
Either will suffice.
Fact is, if they had a warrant, they are well within their legal ability and authority to surveil the location before executing said warrant. This is even more secured if they have a no-knock warrant.
Quote:
|
I was under the impression that was private property, and belonged to the people being targeted.
|
Well then provide evidence to support your impression.
Quote:
|
I don't really need to see a lot more to know that the government is overstepping it's bounds with behavior like that. It smells of Waco, or Ruby Ridge all over again.
|
So you admit to jumping to conclusions. Fair enough.
Quote:
|
Sorry, but where is the outcrry against violence, like I would be dealing with if the shots had flown in the other direction? Where is the condemnation of force?
|
Sorry but unless you can prove they didn't fire less than lethal rounds at the individual your argument doesn't hold any water. You wouldn't give them the benefit of less than lethal that they would probably give you.