Quote:
No, I do not agree to that (or any attempt on your part to set a trap).
A Non-profit organization still can make a big profit but it is just not taxed. Not having to pay tax is another way to get a paycheck from the government because it saves them having to give money to the IRS.
I have no idea what those few people who work at the University of Scotland had on thier mind when conducting their tests. no way to know their motives or whatever. That would be the "missing data" which is needed in order for me to know if they are bias or not.
The World Health Organization is conducting tests on different things all over the world. Supported in large part by the prescription drug industry.
And were involved in a few CIA funded research projects.
The people who donate and take part in protests are guided and motivated by enviornmental groups. That support group was then re-directed to take part in the anti-smoking movement.
I said nothing about a heath insitution being secretly set up. Please re-read what I posted and next time try to pay attention to what I actually said. Bush was going to fund the WHO to offer help to fight AIDS in Africa but South Africa said no... they do not trust that organization and for good reasons. What do they know that you have ignored or have failed to discover?
|
Lol. I was just trying to figure out who you were blaming for what.
So WHO is biased and funded by instutry?
And Industry created the anti smoking campaign to distract people from environmental problems?
I am willing to consider that the anti smoking campaign was exaggerated in order to distract people from bigger issues. But that Conspiracy theory isn't enough to disprove aall the studies done by Universities and Governments. I maintain that smoking contributes to lung cancer, and emphysema.
WHO isn't the only health institution out there.