Quote:
Quote by: gela  Ok.. so the anti-smoking campaign is part of a "help the environment" distraction.. so environmentalists won't protest.. against, umm.. industry in general.
Even though environmentalists have nothing to do with smoking..(why I thought your post had nothing to do with smoking)
And governments are in on it as well...
And the non profit, international, non legally binding health institution was secretly set up by big business..
And that University from Scotland were also being payed out by big business.
Just want to confirm that this is what you agree with. |
No, I do not agree to that (or any attempt on your part to set a trap).
A Non-profit organization still can make a big profit but it is just not taxed. Not having to pay tax is another way to get a paycheck from the government because it saves them having to give money to the IRS.
I have no idea what those few people who work at the University of Scotland had on thier mind when conducting their tests. no way to know their motives or whatever. That would be the "missing data" which is needed in order for me to know if they are bias or not.
The World Health Organization is conducting tests on different things all over the world. Supported in large part by the prescription drug industry.
And were involved in a few CIA funded research projects.
The people who donate and take part in protests are guided and motivated by enviornmental groups. That support group was then re-directed to take part in the anti-smoking movement.
I said nothing about a heath insitution being secretly set up. Please re-read what I posted and next time try to pay attention to what I actually said. Bush was going to fund the WHO to offer help to fight AIDS in Africa but South Africa said no... they do not trust that organization and for good reasons. What do they know that you have ignored or have failed to discover?