Quote:
|
Do you want to start with the Big Bang or do you prefer to stick with life on earth ( aka - evolution and it's orgin ) ?
|
Well, that depends entirely on you. If the idea of creation encompasses the beginning of the universe, then by all means include it. It all depends on what your side has chosen to do.
One question, does your side, and I am saying "your" in the sense of the creation consensus, agree with evolution or does it try to run up alongside it? Is evolution a part of the creation model? Or does it try and make it a substitution?
Quote:
|
Once I or the ID Christians come up with a theory then they must get a peer review of it and have it published. The peer review would be done by scientists already working in the fields of biology or whatever, and I honestly do not think they would give the theory of Creationism two thumbs up. As you might of noticed this topic has been moved from the science forum to this forum, the same thing would happen if you attempted to get Creationism accepted in the scientific community, they would still view it as something mythological, etc. The "keep out" sign was already posted on the doors that hold the titles of science. In other words, you would be debating a low-budget version sub-group of mainstream science. Or my personal opinons.
|
Is that because it's not scientific or because you think scientists, in general, have it out for creationism? A conspiracy?
Quote:
|
So question is: Must it be concidered as science by mainstream science, or just concidered as science by laymen and a minority of scientists?
|
As far as I am concerned there is only one science. The one which involves peer-review and is subject to testing and replication.