Quote:
|
I consider Moral Universalism, Moral Relativism, Moral Objectivism, and Moral Subjectivism to be more like meta-ethics in that they do not posit an ethical theory but rather describe the nature of specific ethical theories.
|
Definitely, and that is basically the function they perform in this discussion -- rather, they "stand in for" or "represent" a class of ethical theories.
Quote:
|
If Moral Universalism, Moral Relativism, Moral Objectivism, and Moral Subjectivism describe the nature of ethical theories but are not ethical theories themselves, how can they incorporate fallacies or contain partially complete views of the facts?
|
See above. They are "standing in for" all the ethical theories of their type.