Quote:
Quote by: gela  Then go out and buy the medical journal.
Sorry, you don't get that kind of info for free.
Of course he doesn't study diseases. He studies populations.
He studies patterns in populations.
He studies patterns between smoking and lung cancer.
It is a very simple concept. One I have been trying to explain to you this whole debate.
Epidemiology - looking at the numbers.
Comparing it to a political poll is ignorant. They just ask yes or no questions.
These surveys ask pages of questions on your life style, and your medical problems.
Obviously he promotes his own company. Its based on sponsorship. If he doesn't have faith in his own company, then how would other people have enough faith in it to sponsor his research?
'And for some reason he has an urge to pass laws in Asia'?
Why on earth would he care about laws in Asia, besides for the health of the country?
The study set out to find if the laws are necessary - the study found that the laws are necessary.
Its a very simple stream of events. Because he was convinced by the results, does not mean he was biased while getting results.
There is no reason for him to be biased for getting a law passed in Asia.
Wait.. I go to bars all the time, It doesn't smell of smoke at all... But its suppose to smell like smoke without smokers there..
Now I'm confused.
I have never heard of any establishment having a fire place without a chimney.. |
I have the feeling you are not comprehending what I wrote.
So, show us a list of the questions they asked. How are we to know they asked questions that included everything that might link something else to a disease or not?
And please do not make a claim and then tell me I must pay for the information that supports that claim. If you want us to buy something go sell it on e-bay, not here.