Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post - Anyone up for a private debate on the merits of creationism as a science?

Technosoul · Mar 15, 2008, 08:14 pm

Do you want to start with the Big Bang or do you prefer to stick with life on earth ( aka - evolution and it's orgin ) ?

I had a close friend who is a Creationist and he talked about it a lot and used to give me those pampets.

I noticed that the majority of the articles were about finding fault with the theory of evolution and other theories science is teaching.

Only the one that I presented in the above link came up with a new theory which might confirm the age old beliefs held by religion. I do not have that book but was able to hear a speech about it.

Where is the scientific theory of Creation by a supernatural intelligence? It is in bits found here and there, but as far as I know no textbook has been written or prepared so that we can know what we are defending or attacking.

The big issue that people are now focusing on is the "single source theory".

Here is a Creationist's point of view.

Y-Origins Connection :: Intelligent Design For Everyone

Here is my simple viewpoint. If we count backwards we go 4-3-2-1-0.

Zero is the orgin out of which 1 would be relative too.

Otherwise we are left with the question, who or what caused the Big Bang. or, how did God come into existance. (what created God).

1 is 1 relative to 0 which then opens up the potential for 2, and 2 is relative to the fact you already had 1.

That is not as brainy as what they do with physics, but math is math.

If we assume that our single source came from another dimension, then we are stuck with the question, where did that other dimension come form? Sooner or later we must trace it all back to nothing-ness. (science dislikes the word "nothingness"). But if I were to create a theory, the source would be nothing - ness.

Then I would demonstrate a process or explaination about how something - aka the Single Source - came into being from nothing.

Mar 15, 2008, 08:14 pm	#17 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul Volcanic Erupter Posts: 8,663	Do you want to start with the Big Bang or do you prefer to stick with life on earth ( aka - evolution and it's orgin ) ? I had a close friend who is a Creationist and he talked about it a lot and used to give me those pampets. I noticed that the majority of the articles were about finding fault with the theory of evolution and other theories science is teaching. Only the one that I presented in the above link came up with a new theory which might confirm the age old beliefs held by religion. I do not have that book but was able to hear a speech about it. Where is the scientific theory of Creation by a supernatural intelligence? It is in bits found here and there, but as far as I know no textbook has been written or prepared so that we can know what we are defending or attacking. The big issue that people are now focusing on is the "single source theory". Here is a Creationist's point of view. Y-Origins Connection :: Intelligent Design For Everyone Here is my simple viewpoint. If we count backwards we go 4-3-2-1-0. Zero is the orgin out of which 1 would be relative too. Otherwise we are left with the question, who or what caused the Big Bang. or, how did God come into existance. (what created God). 1 is 1 relative to 0 which then opens up the potential for 2, and 2 is relative to the fact you already had 1. That is not as brainy as what they do with physics, but math is math. If we assume that our single source came from another dimension, then we are stuck with the question, where did that other dimension come form? Sooner or later we must trace it all back to nothing-ness. (science dislikes the word "nothingness"). But if I were to create a theory, the source would be nothing - ness. Then I would demonstrate a process or explaination about how something - aka the Single Source - came into being from nothing.