Quote:
We have thousands of chruches of different denominations that are located in many countries and they have all claim and teach that the Bible is the Word of God. Is that evidence that I should beleive them?
All the preachers are qualified experts on the Bible.
I will not play the Hitler card. But have noted that "brainwashing" the public is also a science.
If the reports only makes claims and nothing to back up the claim with then it is simply a religion and a cursade to attack "the devil" or "the evil" and nothing more. Not sound science.
It is a known fact that those studies, called epidemiology, are not trustworthy methods to finding absolute truths. The whole methodogy being in employed rasies doubts about each of the studies individually done.
Epidemiology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
They can be influenced by bias.
They can contain Random Errors.
They can contain systematic errors.
Such errors would result in the wrong conclusion of the evidence.
|
How odd.. You have continued to ignor half my sources..
Can't say Im suprised really.. I expected it as soon as I read your post.
You also seem to be contradicting your earlier statement that epidemiology is sound science.
If you doubt the scientists who study epidemiology, then you must equaly doubt any other scientist - because they all do the same thing. Release their results.
You haven't personaly seen fossils of past life forms, slowly progressing. Therefore, evolution is not to be taken seriously.
You haven't personaly done or seen the proof for pythagoras therom - therefore it also can't be trusted.
You haven't personaly done or seen the maths behind E = MC squared. therefore, also a sham.
DNA? You haven't seen it yourself. You haven't seen the detailed science behind finding the structure of DNA. Therefore, Unproven.
trigonometry? How do we know that is true? Mabe our calculators are all programmed to give us a false answeres.
Forget the fact that scientists, and the public in general accept these things as fact. You haven't seen the method behind them, or the proof yourself.
Therefore, they are all one big international attempt at brainwashing the public into thinking things that arn't true.
Theres no logic behind the fact that all the scientists of the world want us to think that adjacent squared, plus opposite squared equals hypotenuse squared. No reason for them to want us to think it. But you havent seen the proof.
The comparison to Church is irrevelent. All the Churchs come from the same source - the bible. That is obviously why they all preach roughly the same thing.
Scientists do seperate studies, in seperate contexts, in seperate countries - all over the world they get the same results.
That is so obvious.. that argument was worthless.
You are also ignoring my plea for you to find any study that claims to find no link between smoking and lung cancer or heart disease or any other disease in the huge list.
How convienient for you to just ignore all of my points, and yell conspiracy.
Do you realise how stupid that sounds?
Finland, America, Australia, Canada, Scottland, and an International, non legally binding, non profit organisation are all equaly corrupt, and they are all trying to brain wash you into thinking that smoking is bad for you.
Quote:
|
I can deal with that fine. It is mostly the bans, the sin taxes, and all those stupid TV ads put out by the anti-smoking people (mostly with false information) that I do not want to deal with, but forced to deal with.
|
Again, it all comes back to you hating everyones attitude to smoking. Why? because you smoke.
The funny thing is, your the one complaining about bias and lack of 'real' science; while your the most biased and unscientific debator here.