[tivodan1116]

Quote by: another day Isn't it fascinating how every pimply faced teenager suddenly becomes an expert on physics and engineering after watching Loose Change.

Pimply-faced teenager and middle-age high-school-diploma-only SWM living with his parents.

I'm tired of hearing ridiculous speculation about how such and such is not possible given the laws of physics. You'd have to be an EXPERT in many fields to make such a judgement. Any sort of rudimentary "formulas" you've cooked up to prove that it's physically impossible are undoubtedly missing dozens of little intricacies that factor into such a huge and complicated event.

Even more irrational in my view are the CT that look at the generally accepted account of events and say "it would have to be a one in a million shot for it to work out like this!!!!" Yes, precisely, which is why it has only happened once.

I for one am not entirely convinced there wasn't a conspiracy of sorts. But why all this ridiculous speculation about holograms and missiles and jet planes when it's completely unnecessary for your argument? If the government wanted those two towers to come down in a terrorist attack that appeared to be planes crashing into buildings, they would have just crashed the planes into the buildings. Straightforward.

It's an "even if" situation.

Even if you don't accept the generally accepted and true account of events - that the attacks were perpetuated by "a bunch of pissed-off Muslims" (to use the South Park vernacular) - Ockham's Razor says that the NEXT most likely theory is something close to that, i.e. that government officials or some such nonsense flew planes into buildings.

Plain and simple, the more layers of complexity you add to a theory, the less likely it is to be true.

If anything I think the government may have had a hand in aiding an already motivated terrorist cell to commit this, without said terrorist cell having knowledge that they were being directly aided by the us government (which would probably dissuade them from "helping").

While I see your point, I find there to be no evidence for the preposterous suggestion that many American citizens participated in such a heinous act and in 7 years not one has stepped forward to admit it.

Quote by: Winter wind Or we could do it right now. Can you present evidence to counter him? (I already have)

Well, to be sure, the OP has presented zero evidence of his "theory". Most of his links are simply to news stories where people state the true account of events. The ones that even insinuate the CT he is pushing are all pages written by him with no outside support (The "checktheevidence.com" links, etc).