Quote:
I think the war in Afghanistan isn't much of a war, so why send more troops there?
Sending troops to Pakistan - what will that accomplish? Will they say that there are terrorists there in Pakistan, so they need to deploy troops there?
|
I wonder whether you have been following developments in the region, are aware of the post 911 US led initiative and acquainted with the general outlines of the current situation.
After 911 there was a radical change in US foreign policy, no longer would the slightest hint of terrorism be the least bit tolerated. Intervention in Afghanistan followed since the government there then was openly supporting Al Qaeda which was sheltered in that country.
Subsequent US occupation of Iraq met with some resistance which stalled progress towards reconstruction there. US military planners successfully deployed an additional 30 thousand troops in a surge which has proven effective in accomplishing all its stated goals, breaking the apparent 'quagmire' and routing the insurgency and terrorists. Thus it appears military planners would try and replicate the successful tactics employed in Iraq with a surge in Afghanistan.
Pakistan, a country that shares a border with Afghanistan, is believed to host fleeing remnants of Al Qaeda, including Osama bin Laden himself. These terrorists have hidden in the Himalayan foothills located in disputed territories on Pakistan's border. The US has sought to go after Osama and Al Qaeda in the disputed territories, but has not secured access yet. Now they are training, equiping and improving Pakistani 'special forces' to tackle Osama and Al Qaeda in the area.