[rez]

Quote by: Chancellor According to a February 7, 1999 Boston Globe article, Ruth Hubbard, a board member of The Council for Responsible Genetics, and the author of Exploding the Gene Myth, said that searching for a gay gene "is not even a worthwhile pursuit...Let me be very clear: I don't think there is any single gene that governs any complex human behavior. There are genetic components in everything we do, and it is foolish to say genes are not involved, but I don't think they are decisive."

Nope they are not but they sure are helpful in understanding the question at hand.

homosexuality is more apparent in identical twins, so it does show that shared genes play a role in this.

Population control is a rather silly assessment considering that increase in population plays absolutely no role in how the biology of humans work.

You would think that such a gene would have been selected out of the pool considering the stigma associated with such a trait.

I am of the opinion that gayness has to deal with the biology of the women when she is pregnant in which case it all depends on her hormones and antibodies that are released.