Quote:
Quote by: Zeebadee  You keep talking about "magic" and "mythology" and "god", yet offer no reason why any of them would be necessary. |
But that's what you have been claiming. I don't see any reason why any of them would be necessary for reality, only for creationism.
Quote:
|
The idea of a creator requires no religion, no god, no supernatural means.
|
Please pick a horse and ride it. You can't change it up every time you realize that you have made yourself look silly. You were talking about creationism, which requires a supernatural creator; in short, a god. Now you are pretending that somehow there is no creator in creationism, that somehow "creationism" means that the universe and life somehow arose without any sort of supernatural intervention by some magical being. Please make up your mind. Or are you being intentionally disingenuous?
Quote:
|
In fact, you haven't offered any evidence that "natural means" doesn't include a creator.
|
So you are saying that the "creator" is nothing more than natural causes? You are denying that there is any supernatural being that must be worshiped that is responsible for the entire universe? So you are saying that the big bang, abiogenesis, and evolutionary theories are just other statements of "the creator?"
That's really funny and pretty much a 180 turn from creationism.
So are you just trolling with nonsense?