grandpa..Surely you jest?
Quote:
|
Obviously, that is logical. If we know for a fact that Saddam didn't have a nuclear wepaons program, how would it justify the invasion
|
It has been admitted that Saddams nuclear capabilty had been destroyed by Israel but as I posted above he still had a program? Plus you slip into the good old ploy of insisting WMD means only nuclear weapons? Thats antiwar manufactured BS not logic!
He had biological and chemical WMD and used them. Don't give us that illogical assumption and clam its logical;. Its as bad as the assertion about Iraq having the missile capability to strike continental USA?
The invasion was not launched because of any Iraqi nuclear threat and no one with a logical outlook admits such nonsense. Saddam had WMD(chemical and biological) and still had a nuclear program. The war was launched by congressional approval to deter Saddams expansionist aims in the middle east and to try to stabilize the region? It was a follow omn in the war against international terrorism.