Quote:
Quote by: Rainbow  Russia endorses peace all over the globe, then see Chechnya for outcomes.
China promotes meditation, especially for Tibet region.
Iran loves nuclear unification, over the whole Middle-East region.
Syria supplies "live-bombers" to ensure and/or enforce peace, love and tranquillity.
Etc.
These states have nothing to do with your definition for "terrorism-filled-with" activity.
Am I correct ?
Politics is a dirty business. Neither Morality nor Ethics is being listed within political menu. Idealism and Pacifism go the opposite way. |
No, but you're correct those states do support terrorism, but so does the the U.K. and the U.S. To think only other countries (the axis of evil) support terrorism is naive, and lacks any serious study of history. The Boxer rebellion would be a good place to start with the history of terrorism sponsored by the U.K. and U.S. in Asia.
Even if you try to justify terrorism sponsored by the U.S. as necessary to counter act the terrorism sponsored by its enemies, it doesn't change the fact that is it still terrorism. Terrorism by any country is wrong.. Am I right?
I'm in no way part of the political system, so morality and ethics hold a higher place in my opinion.