Quote:
Quote by: Nono  Whereas at the moment you have a pampered agricultural sector and a bloated military all funded by China's central bank. Until such time as the Chinese cash their cheque. Then you'll be screwed.
And all this under a president who has a history of goofing off, ruining perfectly good companies and speeding while drunk and under the influence of cocaine.
Time for a change, boyos. |
Very true, but that definition of change varies!
(1) Democrats: The change proposed by the Democrats is more and taxes spending 10 fold (for Obama it could mean more war, Danfur and Pakistan and I doubt he will yank us out of Iraq like he says).
(2) For the Republicans: It varies. All want to keep us in Iraq. Guiliani is proposing the largest tax cuts in American history. And all are preaching cutting spending, which could be barking and not biting
(3) Libertarians (Ron Paul): Is preaching cutting spending and taxes to levels not seen since before the new deals. Immediate withdrawal from Iraq and some, what people might say, "radical" deregulation of business and agency cutting. This view would bring the most change.
However, the most change is not always the best option, although in the right circumstances it could be.