| Life existing on other planets is practically fact. At the same time as we do is a bit more debatable, but still very likely. Also, why does life have to be Hydrogen based? Say hello to trillions of more planets for potential of life. The likelihood of coming across a species on another planet is very unlikely. Were pretty much on the verge of killing ourselves already. We've already found over 130 planets outside of our solar system at least, the last time i checked, which wasn't recent by the way. For those of you who want to know how, they have a little process. They look at a star, if it wobbles (possibly meaning a gravitational pull of an orbiting planet) they keep observing the star. If the see a spot moving across surface of the star that eventually disappears on the other side, then they pretty much have found a new planet. They observe other things to make sure, and then they classify it. If I'm correct they name them after the star with a number after it. At least thats how they named the planets they first found. Also, they have found evidence, and what they believe to be ice, on Mars. We might find extinct life similar to us, or some subterranean (sorry, lack of a better word, i know "Terra" means earth) species that might still exist. Then you have the satellite (moon, for those of you who don't know what that meant) orbiting Jupiter, I think Io, might have oceans under the icy surface. Yet, again, life can exist almost everywhere. There might be life on Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, etc. due to life's ability to adapt. So lets hope someone comes and disagrees with us so we can have a great debate.
Knowledge is power, use it well.
Don't fear the unknown, seek to understand it
Formerly Halofan48 Fun game!!! |