[Charlatan]

International law? What is that? I have bnever heard of a country being forced to do anything by a law, but wars have been fought replacing the urgency to have the other party accept what is generalised as decent with physical force, so these forces are not bringing law, as nothing remains but the removal of the other's law. Take slavery, some thought it was ok and others fought wars to stop it, and make it a law that they would keep. International norms their may be, but there is no international law as not everyone subscribes to the united nations. Maybe if all countries were part of a holding party - as in not free countries, like colonies - then there may be international law, but until then there is only force to make others comply to a norm, or change their own laws. If some of the stricter middle east countries were making the laws, then we would all live differently, but they don't, so their laws are not international. If slavery ever surfaced again, maybe outide of the laws of the country concerned, then it is breaking the law. If America and Europe agreed that it was a good idea, it could be written into the laws, and others could disagree, resulting eventually in a show of force. So if you refer to a international law, 'might makes right.'

As for the Gaza strip, it is written into their charter to kill a certain kind of person, so they could change the charter, meaning that they now accept this kind of person, which would be mature. It is immature to generalise people by their place of birth or descendancy, and old fashioned. Will they ever succeed in eliminating all Jews? People have moved all over the world, so they should be after them too, as the Jews with the real power live outside of Israel, so what is the point of attacking a powerless enemy when the powerful are out of reach? Their motivation for killing Jews is about ethnic cleansing, but about submitting, or being one who submits, they should see their testaments intertwined, so there should be a feeling of brotherhood between them instead of this refusal to accept the other's existence. Wat law condondes death? To what do they owe an explanation? They exist not as a mistake but a 'creation under God', as far as religious people are concerned, and no law calls for death like this but one that is savage. Is living making the land dirty? What then have the Jews done wrong? Maybe there should be an explantion for why people write laws against this type of person, where they must die for being a part of something that we are all a part of together. If they were made to go to war for their being alive then they would have claws and teeth like that, but such is not the case, so they are not meant to go to war for whatever reasons they have come up with. What people do have is hands and minds for trading, building, and other constructive things, so how can a person that has been made to do things constructively be meant to die or to kill another? The reason had better be good, more than not liking the other person because of physical properties they don't like. We are social 'animals' and should act that way, not for any other reasons than to make it better than it is, and killing another social animal is seen as a mistake, not a blessing.

So whether you believe in God or not, think why it is we are geared to socialize and build so. Killing was never meant to be a part of our day to day things, as our bodies aren't even meant to eat meat, so we are meant, by God or nature, to get along. All wars should have an objective, and ethnic cleansing is not something stipulated by God or nature, so it is a cultural thing. Monuments were not built for the destruction of others in this area, only for worship, which brings people together, under any guise you like.