Quote:
Quote by: brien  Try punishing the criminal who uses the firearm in the commission of a crime with these penalties:
Ist offense: 10 years minimum, no parole.
2nd offense: 20 year minimum, no parole
3rd Offense: Life no parole.
And if a criminal discharges a firearm during the commission of a crime and wounds an innocent person, then he/she should be sentenced for 20 years no parole. Of course murder w/ a firearm should be life no parole.
Enact these penalties and I am certain we will see the incidence of firearms related crimes subside. |
That's all fine and dandy, we have similar laws up here as well, but that does not solve my question or the problem presented.
I shall rephrase my question on the real life issue:
How do you prevent people from continuing these types of crimes of mass shootings and murders, if they are in almost every case, actually all of them, are suicidal and die before they are even arrested?
This is the new trend now a days, even buddy at the university in Montreal not too long ago.
Oh yeah, and to save everybody time in you trying to use that as an example of a failed system.... compare totals between each countries in these situations and see who has the most and ponder just for a second as to why.
But back to the question. What is the solution to reducing the amount of these suicidal mass shooters?
And I am not expecting an answer of no firearms.... I'm looking for another answer besides that, which would help both countries and cultures, including those who still want their rights to firearms.
See I have a solution which keeps both parties happy in their own way, as when I was a wee lad in high school, I came to that 50/50 mentality where you either do it or don't... of course I got smart and didn't, nor have any plans to do so, but I know what is being looked for in each situation.
and just blabbing it out isn't any fun at all now is it?