View Single Post
Old Dec 7, 2007, 12:46 pm   #61 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Quote:
Prax said:
Once apon a time it was logical to think the earth was flat, now it is logical to think that it is spherical.
It was never "logical" to think the earth was flat. That was taken from religion and mythical doctrines.

Logic has proven the earth is a geoid, though it appears spherical.

Quote:
Prax said:
Once apon a time it was illogical to think we could reach space, break the sound barrier, fly period.... what is logical to some may not be logical to others, and sorry, I don't think in the narrow perspective that it isn't subjective.
Well, you're wrong. It was postulated that man couldn't reach space, break the sound barrier, or fly. Logic has proven them all wrong, by removing contradiction systematicly.

Quote:
Prax said:
I don't expect you to agree or understand, nor do I care, no offense.
The only offense is the assault on logic, because you don't understand it.

Quote:
Prax said:
A knife is better then a fist.
A gun is better then a knife.

My whole point. People have a right to competent defense against reasonable threats that exist. In a world of massive armies bearing bombs, space-capable missiles, all the way down to the common bayonet affixed to the tip of a firearm, firearms are the most logical, most practical, most reasonable means of individual defense against all known threats using physical force.

Quote:
Chaos said:
The argument they're making (at least as far as I can tell) is that while it is your right to possess a gun, you cannot prove it is directly improving your safety.
I can do that at anytime, through simple tests and examples, as they have been done throughout time to prove this exact case.

Quote:
Chaos said:
If one is simply lucky and never has their home broken into, is never mugged, etc and they don't possess a gun, clearly the gun isn't the factor that changed anything.
Unless the gun served as a deterrent, which is provable.

Quote:
Chaos said:
Citizens without guns who do not end up dealing with crime are the control for this experiment.
What experiment?

Quote:
Chaos said:
Also, guns do not PREVENT crime.
Guns can help prevent crime as a deterrent.
Being armed and trained with a firearm also can help to prevent crime.

NOTHING prevents crime entirely, and I haven't seen anyone put that forth as an argument.

Quote:
Chaos said:
Really it's a matter of where you live (areas prone to crime or not) and luck. The gun is merely a tool that you can use to increase your chance of survival,
Thank you for acknowledging that obvious point.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote