Quote:
Chaoss said:
You think one should be shot for inconveniencing another?
|
Obviously not. I don't think people have the right to trespass at whim.
Who are you to defend that right to trespass at whim? On what ground?
Quote:
Chaoss said:
Having them clean it up and maybe a fine/restitution isn't sufficient?
|
Provided they don't over-react or panic when the property owner comes out to investigate with his firearm, and cause him to shoot them, FOR VIOLATING HIS PROPERTY RIGHTS.
Quote:
Chaoss said:
All I'm saying is with something as important as the law regarding lethal force, it should be a tad more specific than criminal mischief.
|
BS, people should be taught to respect property rights.
If a TP'ing kid is shot violating property rights, who is at fault if the person who did the shooting felt threatened, ON HIS PROPERTY by trespassers who had no right to be there?
You sound like you would defend a person who was breaking into a home, and injured themselves because they tripped over a childs toy left in front of the locked door they just broke through.