Quote:
|
THE AMENDMENT DIDN'T SAY THAT THEY CAN REGULATE THE MILITIA.
|
Then who?
"A well regulated Militia"
And you need to put your head on your desk for a few seconds. This is a debate forum, not the Taiwanese legislature. None of this matters. Drink some water or something.
Quote:
|
And no, the European statistics don't hold water. The reason is because of the "apples and oranges" argument you list in your OP, and never even attempt to rebuke. Your only counter has thusfar been "But cmon, look at the numbers!!!"
|
Only said that once and i didn't use that many "!" *pouts*
My argument was close enough in the sense is a way to avoid speculation is to compare the United States to other countries. Far too often I hear "but if there were more guns, the united states would be safer" which is speculative at best.
Quote:
Clearly you don't know how this 'debate' thing works.
You are making a positive claim (that banning guns decreases gun related homicide).
You have to prove it. It's not up to me to disprove it before you even properly support it.
|
Yes, but i did prove it. It is up to you to support your counters with evidence, rather then the argument its apples to oranges. In a debate, your rebuttals has to have substance behind it otherwise its just hearsay.