Quote:
Quote by: Winter wind  It is subjective, I was hoping you could see why on your own so i didn't look like I was flaming |
Wrong. You are semantically and tragically confused.
The second amendment guarantees an individual right. It then validates that right. The fact that the validation doesn't hold true in all circumstances doesn't mean that the right doesn't exist.
Quote:
|
subjective, unnecessary and borderline flaming.
|
You'll only get more "borderline flaming" if you continue to respond to arbitrary segments of my words in piecemeal and consistently use the word "subjective" in a laughably unfitting context.
Quote:
|
they said a regulated militia, who do you think was supposed to regulate it. They did not specify how much regulation.
|
THE AMENDMENT DIDN'T SAY THAT
THEY CAN REGULATE THE MILITIA.
Quote:
|
and since you give no stats or hard facts in your rather bizarre argument, i don't know how you can call your argument objective.
|
Clearly you don't know how this 'debate' thing works.
You are making a positive claim (that banning guns decreases gun related homicide).
You have to prove it. It's not up to me to disprove it before you even properly support it.
And no, the European statistics don't hold water. The reason is because of the "apples and oranges" argument you list in your OP, and never even attempt to rebuke. Your only counter has thusfar been "But cmon, look at the numbers!!!"