Quote:
|
ya but the American people are more homicidal to the tune of 31888 more? There could have been 10 times more deaths in these countries and the United States would still be larger by 30000. It also gets rid of the argument that people will get the guns no matter what cause don't tell me Great Briton and Australia doesn't have crime.
|
WTF?
That doesn't even come close to responding to the point..?
You just repeated the numbers.. Repeating the same thing ad nauseum doesn't make it true or supportive of your point. You were told that the cultures are different. You responded with "omg but look at all the murders!"
That doesn't prove anything. It's an appeal to emotion, which is a logical fallacy.
Correlation doesn't necessitate causation. If you want the actual facts, and not your own amateur misinterpretation of them, read through these links:
GOA Fact Sheet-- 2001 Gun Control Facts AOU - Gun Control Facts
Also, if you'll look at this graph:
StateMaster - Firearms Death Rate per 100,000 (most recent) by state
You'll see that DC has the highest homicide rate. Why would the only city on the graph with a gunban have the highest homicide rate if if banishment is the end-all of violent crime?
Quote:
My objective facts are
legally, in the second amendment, the words "regulated" and "militia" are used, and they didn't enumerate farther meaning the federal government is entitled to regulate it as far as the want.
|
Bullsh*t.
The founding fathers said that
because of the need for a militia, the
individual right to own firearms is not to be infringed upon. I have no idea what childish notion gave you the impression that
any interpretation of the second amendment gives the government power to "regulate it as far as the[sic] want."