View Single Post
Old Nov 30, 2007, 01:41 pm   #8 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Quote:
WinterWind said:
That you would ask a person to go through a long and difficult (in my opinion) driving test before getting something with only the potential to be a weapon.
Quote:
Chancellor said:
Since people are required to take a driving test before being given a driver's license, why not a mandatory gun safety training course (perhaps one developed by the NRA)?
Quote:
ZNYFRH said:
I have the same logic.

You need a license to drive a car... and are required to demonstrate competency.

Should be the same for firearms.
Driving is a privlidge.
Travelling is not.

You need a license to drive because driving is a privlidge, not a right.

Travelling is a right, and you need no test to operate your own two feet.

Arms for defense are a right, not a privlidge, so the government can't demand a test for ownership and still maintain its current system.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote