I'm an independent, but that's neither here nor there
I don't want to make this a fight over the definition.
We like proof here, and evidence. I don't like how you just say things without backing them up.
Quote:
|
Women should be feminine if they want to attract a man, the same way women are attracted to masculine men. Ever heard a woman say she's looking for a feminine man?
|
Women should be more "feminine" if they are looking to attract a man looking for a more "feminine" girl. What the hell difference does it make if the woman doesn't want to change the way she is. Because if I'm not wrong, you're saying that all girls should just became as "feminine" as possible so they can get married. But there are guys out there who like girls who can think for themselves and who can handle themselves well. Who are tough, and have a sense of bravery. I'm one. As "feminine" In a guy that may be, I don't care. There are girls out there looking for softer guys and there are guys who are looking for smarter and less wishy washy girls.
So don't say it's for the woman's own good to act "feminine" which is only your definition what ever the hell it is. If it's that they become submissive and take orders from the guy unquestioningly, then you go find that girl, but don't you dare tell everyone else that that is the only way you are going to attract others. For lack of another term, it is pathetic. I'm not being politically correct. This is what I think. And if you think that I'm stupid and have been branded by society, I don't care.