JRG - bush never directly said that saddam had a hand in 9/11. but, he and his deputees have tied saddam with 9/11 in their rhetoric. and his administration has desperately tried to "prove" that saddam was connected to 9/11.
here are some things that bush did say:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3119676.stm
if you don't think that he tried to tie saddam with 9/11, i have piece of land i'd like to sell you. it isn't hard to see through their double speak. they'll admit under their breath that saddam had no part in 9/11, while spewing all sorts of allegations that he trained terrorists, was an active supporter of terrorists, etc..
mix that in with a couple false claims or lies about wmd and you have one tasty sandwich.
Quote:
| I'm sure there's more than a few posters here deperately trying to figure out how to rebut this latest nail in the coffin. |
like bugs in a jar, trying like crazy to find a hole so they can escape. imo, more and more bush supporters would simply prefer to ignore all of bush's lies than continue to protect him. coming from a former bush supporter, i know first-hand that the lack of vindicating proof is demoralizing the hell out of the bush camp. naturally, they won't admit it of course.