Quote:
Dieval said:
And just how do you determine if there's an "IMMINENT THREAT" if you don't have access to how these people are communicating?
|
Hahahah.... nice...
The authorities don't need "access" unless there is otherwise PROOF of an imminent threat.
They have no right to monitor private calls, e-mails or any other private conversation except through BS Laws created through judicial activism.
This is Canada we are speaking of though, so, it's not like as a Canadian I would have much stance on individual rights in law.
Good thing I am not Canadian.
Quote:
Dieval said:
I'm not saying they should have access to everything all the time,
|
Really? It sure seems that way.
Quote:
Dieval said:
but when it's next to impossible to get access to information that can help them find people that want to do harm to their country...isn't that a bit anti-productive?
|
Depends on what you value more, the police state, or privacy.
Without privacy or individual rights, there isn't much to protect.