| Fair enough castille, fair enough, also because you see what worries me.
A couple of observations though:
- in principle I think it would be saner for people to like doing something & then doing great deeds with it or in it. Doing great deeds, chasing the big money, as such, risk to leave us with leading success people feeling as if they basically won the Lotto but had to waste their lifes for doing it whilst leaving us with many more with no skill & talent other than seeing begrudgedly how others with a tad of better fortune did succeed
- many people can see their talent in raising kids in security, there´s an element to be grateful for because no enterprise would succeed without these people - just as raising kids in security does not necessarily have to be a show of conformism, in fact, in current days, it starts to take on an aspect of herosim (also because people going for it leave little or no space for people going for it whilst caring for children)
- society would do well to get rid of many hurdles to entrepreneurs, but it would do equally well in having them pay a part of their success to all those creating a market for their products
Personally, I´d prefer children after college to get 2 years to go about - earning somehow a living - to be better informed as to their talents if it happens to be the case their talent is to study more. Likewise - instead of doing all of the studying in one lump up-front, it´d be nice to spread it over oneùs lifetime - taste for talent shifts with the years, you know.
AO |