| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (GreatWyrm of Babylon,) A logical fallicy demands a conclusion, I failed to post a conclusion, so how can it be a logical fallicy? Please explain or shut up. Because the way I see it you are simply avoiding the question.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'></span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (GreatWyrm of Babylon,) It cannot be because they do not work, because on the average they put more time into managing their assests than the average person does working.
It cannot be because they are happier, they have a higher suicide rate, and are generally less happy than the average person.
It cannot be because they are stealing your money, since they invest and money not in someones pocket does not affect anyone's income.
It cannot be because they take all the women, figure you can figure that one out.
So why?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>Because you refute claims that we didn't make, you ninny; and concluding that we're wrong by them. And I will not shut up.
. . . whenever any government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such forms as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. |