Quote:
|
Nowhere in the Bill of Rights does it mention "unalienable rights". That phrase only exists in the Declaration of Independence, which, despite your defining it as one of the "Charters of Freedom", is not a legal document. It's simply a list of grievances published as a PR document to justify our rebellion to the world.
|
Sonart minimizes the DOI because he refuses to understand that this document issued by our Founding Fathers is the cornerstone of the ideology of the United States of America and specifically states the reasons for founding this nation. It is the foundation of our political system. The DOI sets up government to secure the rights outlined in the document. It states:
[quote]
Quote:
The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
|
Therefore, we see how the DOI is inextricably linked to the Constitution of the US on the issue of rights alone. Since many of the signers of the DOI also signed the Constitution, we must accept these men all agreed that the use of the word "rights" in the Constitution was derived from the same meaning they agreed to use in the DOI. Anyone who attempts to divorce the influence of the DOI from the Constitution and the establishment of the foundations of the government, either doesn't know those documents as well as can be understood, or they have an agenda that perhaps serves a pernicious attempt to undermine our Constitution and the very foundations of our nation.