| I read the entire thread of this hoax supporter, and other than an ability to copy/paste and ignore his own inconsistencies I don't see where he made his case at all. He doesn't know where objects were in relation to one another but claims that shadows are wrong, he refuses to admit that lens flares account for the images he questions. The dude's a loon, and so obsessed by his conspiracy beliefs that he cannot see outside that little box. He refuses to cite sources, vaguely remembers reading something others are able to quote from the source; all in all he fails to support his contentions and falls back on insult when he can't argue properly. A poor debater and an even worse spokesman for his group of deniers. |