View Single Post
Old Nov 5, 2007, 04:03 am   #70 (permalink) (top)
phoenix_fire
Paladin
 
phoenix_fire's Avatar
 
Location: Narnia
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Quote by: rez View Post
Sorry, but the source is a complete lie when it says there is no evidence. You just so happen to follow that source. To say there is no evidence would be a lie.


Where did you read anything just poofing into existence? Please address the actual argument...

If you can't understand macroevolution, then you can't understand microevolution. They work hand in hand.. They are basically the same thing! It is just that one focuses on what happens in the short period of time and the other focuses on the longer period of time.
I did address the argument. I do not like repeating myself.

I understand macroevolution. I just think it's wrong. Geez. I can't stand it when people assume that if you disagree with them, you just don't understand the question. Sheesh. The article stated, and I agree, that there is only so much elasticity in the potential for change in creatures. As it says, eventually you will either cease to have a viable creature, or it will revert to the original form.



Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame. -- Song 8:6
phoenix_fire is offline   Reply With Quote