Quote:
Quote by: nerdvincent  -We've found interspecies fossils.
-The original evolution theory has been improved many time.
-The eye evolution story has been cited in many threads, and is no more a mystery in scientific world. Dot.
-Breeding experiment gave support to Darwin even before he was born.
-Proving evolution is bullshit would just lead to make another scientific theory, fitting with every experiments. Christian creationism don't, so forget about it. There is more than two sides fighting, so evolution losing desn't mean bible win, it means bible will fight against another stronger theory.
Your site is very partial. It slowly goes, in a not-that-subtile way, from "some scientific say.." to ''...forget about it and let pray!". The "Let common sense prevails" part is especially funny. It shows all the "we told you so, now shut up" side of clericalism. |
A lot of these so-called "missing links", however, have been proven to be less than legitimate, either by unintentional mixing at burial sites or by outright and premeditated fraud.
It has been changed, but I rather think that it is beating a dead horse.
Do you have a different explanation for the eye?
Breeding supports microevolution. As demonstrated previously, it runs into problems with macroevolution.
As I've said before, I don't believe evolution and Christianity to be mutually exclusive. I'm all for bringing on a different theory. I have a scientific curiosity in this matter. The new theory wouldn't change my mind either. But for a lot of scientists who want to be taken seriously, evolution has become a dogma, a doctrine in the church of "intellectual honesty" to which one has to ascribe to be a member of the club. Kinda like how anime fans have to hate English dubs to be taken seriously as a member of the community. You guys have a whole lot more emotion invested in it than I do.
I've already mentioned the partiality of the site, so don't act like I was trying to hide it. Interestingly, though, when proposing something different from the dogmatic idols of science, serious scientific dissenters often have to find alternate channels to get a hearing. For many scientists, saying that evolution is not all that plausible is like saying the earth is flat. But I think it is the nature of science to scrutinize and test and trial-by-fire theories like evolution. Do you not welcome the accountability?