View Single Post
Old Oct 22, 2007, 12:39 pm   #18 (permalink) (top)
Chancellor
It's my first name!
 
Chancellor's Avatar
 
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,523
Quote:
Quote by: rez View Post
LOL. design implies designer. There would be no other reason to think design.
I don't give a rat's behind about "implies"! Those who promote ID do not go beyond design to identifying a designer because that would require something that falls outside of what they say is science.

Quote:
It is the Creationist that thinks the Christian god created teh universe. Then there are other creationists, such as the Chinese folklore creationists and the native american creationists. But, I am sure you don't think they are real just like they don't think your creation story is real.
Well, at least that there is a specific designer - whether the Judeo-Christian God, various other deities or whatever.

Quote:
Please provide these observations. Hopefully your observations are a little different then all the other types of creationists out there.
If you want THEIR observations, ask them!

Quote:
That is because you are uneducated in the field of science.
Not true.

Quote:
It is not a conclusion whatsoever, if you had a basic biology class you would understand that and not even attempt to make such an ignorant comment.
It damned well IS a conclusion! It's what comes out of the other side after you've done all your observing and hypothesizing and theorizing.

Quote:
Thats right, you don't know what "elements" and "molecules" --- like "whatever"....
And apparently neither does science.

Quote:
If you are going to suggest that the current acceptable explanation for how reality works is flawed, then atleast understand what the current accepted explanation is.
I suggested nothing and you damned well had better knock it off with all this reading into what people write!

Quote:
If you can't understand what the current explanation for how reality works, then how can you even understand how your explanation is better? What is it better then? Please provide a clear concise post as to how your explanation is better. What is it better then? Do you even know what explanation you are comparing your explanation with?
I can only go by what your side is saying. You people are the ones that put forth the so-called "big bang" theory (even though the notion of a bang isn't really accepted in science today): it's up to you to identify what specifically it was that all of a sudden just started expanding. It's up to you to not only identify what it was but also where it came from.


"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own." -John Quincy Adams -
Chancellor is offline   Reply With Quote