Quote:
|
Quote by: technosoul The difference is she wants to sign the international treaty that would establish a plan, with oversite inspectors, to disarm all countries by downsizing nuclear stock piles and by disarming missles with nuclear war heads. |
while you seem to readily digest whatever hillary says, i am not about to confuse this politician's campaign rhetoric as being something immediately credible or trustworthy. moreover, this is a difference without much distinction. bush would also love to have a unscr against iran, just like 1441 for iraq... nevertheless, "all options are on the table" as hillary plainly states.
if iran doesn't cave in, she's willing to go to war - period. none of the apologist hot air seems to have refuted that point.
Quote:
|
Quote by: technosoul And concerning Iraq their is a difference, the democrats want to pull out and the republicans want to stay and continue the war. |
the public elected democrats in the past election, in hopes that with control over congress, that they'd find a way to start bringing the troops home. several months later, and not a single notable accomplishment. for you to assert that the democrats want to pull out, given what they've done with their newfound power, is totally laughable. accept the reality that there are many more pro-war democrats than you with to believe - including hillary (and all other dems with voting records identical to republicans). and, accept the reality that the anti-war crowd remain a bunch of spineless jellyfish, incapable of influencing themselves upon congress.